Security issuer rights management process (SIRMP) and internet-based network for carrying out the same

ABSTRACT

An Internet-based method and system which inherently recognizes the separable, withholdable, and transferable rights associated with issuing equity, debt, and/or hybrid securities, thereby enabling the maximization of economic value that such property can support within a society. According to the method and system, the security rights that issuers of equity, debt and hybrid securities possess prior to structuring and issuance are unbundled (i.e. individually recognized and separated), allowing a security issuer to withhold from issuance, and retain, the ability to lend its security/securities or, to restructure and reissue its security/securities, and retain, the ability to lend its security/securities, in order to preclude, or to control and manage, short-selling of its securities. Currently, there is no mechanism by which companies, governments, or other entities can preclude or control short-selling once they issue securities.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates to a method of, and system for, enabling companies issuing both equity and debt, and governments and government agencies issuing debt, to exercise the rights they possess as issuers of equity and debt in order to manage and optimize the utility and value of their offerings and holdings in the global financial marketplace.

2. Brief Description of the Prior Art

In conventional securities issuance, as set forth in FIG. 1 of the Drawings, the issuing company or government enlists the aid of an investment bank in order, first, to structure the equity or debt offering and second, to underwrite/distribute the offering to purchasers. The investment bank then returns the proceeds, less applicable fees, from the equity/debt sale to the issuing company or government.

Issuers of equity and debt have many options from which to choose when trying to raise money. Typically, a company can issue common or preferred stock (equity), or a company or government can issue different types of debt, with the primary differentiators being the terms (contract) under which the debt is issued, and the tax treatment of periodic interest payments.

Companies (equity and debt) and governments (debt) try to issue equity and debt under conditions most favorable to themselves while, at the same time, they try to sate the appetites of investors so that equity and debt offerings are fully subscribed, in order to allow the company or government to raise the full amount of money required/sought.

One of the problems that many companies, governments and, ultimately, investors in the companies' and governments' equity and debt, encounter is that of short-selling, through which, investors and speculators borrow a company's or government's equity and/or debt from the owner or holder (fiduciary) and sell it in the market hoping to buy it back at a lower price and make a profit. Short-selling puts downward pressure on a company's shares and/or debt, or on a government's debt, which can have several harmful effects. First, as the price of a security falls, it can force long-term holders, who have been loyal to the company or government, to sell their securities to avoid a loss, which then adds to the selling pressure on a company's or government's securities and drives their price(s) lower. More importantly, as has been illustrated in this latest credit crisis, pressure from short-sellers can both raise the price to a company or government of raising capital via debt sales, and it can create excessive shareholder dilution when a company is forced to raise capital by selling more shares at lower prices.

However, short-selling has several functions. It allows investors with exposure to a company's equity and/or debt, and/or to a government's debt, to hedge their exposure by having an offsetting position in either the underlying equity or debt instrument or through a derivative instrument; in the event the hedge is in the form of a derivative instrument, the seller of that derivative instrument usually has to sell short a company's equity/debt or, if a government-based derivative, the government's debt, in order to hedge the derivative seller's downside exposure. Short-selling is also employed by speculators (hedge funds, bank trading desks, individuals, etc.) to make a direct bet against the underlying equity or debt of a company or government.

The advent of more sophisticated derivatives like credit default swaps (CDS's), levered exchange-traded funds (ETF's), and other exotic derivatives, along with the proliferation of hedge funds and other speculative interests, have combined to allow speculators and hedgers to put undue and intentional selling pressure on the equity and/or debt of a company or on the debt of government entities. A great example of this is the credit default swap market, which was started to allow lenders to hedge against the debt of companies to which they were lending. Today, the credit default swap market has underlying, issued debt totaling approximately $2 trillion, but the outstanding credit default swaps in existence total approximately $50 trillion.

An example of the unintended consequences of allowing investors, speculators and others to participate in these massively leveraged short sales is the collapse in 2008 of Bear Stearns, which was ultimately sold to JP Morgan Chase in a forced sale by the U.S. government. The Thursday before the weekend collapse of Bear Stearns, the CEO went on national television to proclaim that Bear Stearns had in excess of $17 billion of capital and that it would weather the growing financial crisis. However, massive short sales of the company's stock, combined with large buying of low-delta (out-of-the-money) put options and credit default swaps, made Bear Stearns appear to be on shaky financial ground. This, in turn, prompted those holding Bear Stearns' stock and debt to sell, which exerted additional downward pressure on the company's outstanding equity and debt. Customers of Bear Stearns, unnerved by the company's rapidly collapsing stock and bond issues, moved quickly to pull their funds on deposit with Bear Stearns, and the company quickly ran short of capital prompting government intervention. Without the use of large short sales and the aforementioned highly leveraged derivative instruments, which allowed speculators and others to cause massive selling of the underlying stock and bond issues as they were sold by the sellers of the derivatives instruments in order to hedge their exposures, Bear Stearns might have survived as an independent, ongoing entity.

Another problem caused by massive short-selling of a company's equity and/or debt, and of a government's debt, is that the further the prices of equity and/or debt are depressed by short-selling, the harder, more expensive, and more dilutive it becomes for a company or government to raise additional capital through additional debt or equity sales. Excessive selling pressure, via short sales and derivative instruments, on corporate or government debt, as has happened in this most recent financial crisis, can influence and/or cause rating agencies to downgrade a company's or government's financial ratings, thereby increasing the cost of raising additional capital via debt sales. Similarly, excessive downward pressure, via short sales and derivative instruments, on a company's stock can depress the stock to extremely low levels making additional equity sales highly dilutive to existing shareholders. In extreme cases, this pressure on a company's stock can make it virtually impossible to raise new capital via equity sales because of the dilutive effects.

Another problem associated with short-selling is that of naked short-selling, wherein a speculator or investor sells short a company's equity and/or debt or a government's debt without first sourcing the equity or debt to deliver against the short-sale. In naked short-selling, a speculator or investor sells short a company's equity or debt, or a government's debt, and then has a certain amount of time to find/borrow the shares or debt to deliver against the established short position. Naked short-selling, while illegal, is rarely prosecuted, as most of the time speculators and investors are able to find the equity or debt to deliver against their pre-established short position(s). Nevertheless, naked short-selling allows speculators to sell huge quantities of a company's equity or debt, or a government's debt, creating unnecessary downward price pressure on those instruments.

Securities lending is another business that fosters short-selling. “Securities lending is an over-the-counter market, so the size of this industry is difficult to estimate accurately. According to the industry group ISLA, in the year 2007, the balance of securities on loan exceeds $2 trillion globally.

The principal reason for borrowing a security is to cover a short position. Securities lending & borrowing is often required, by matter of law, to engage in short selling.” (Source: Wikipedia)

Recently, there have been several attempts, all regulatory, to address the problems associated with and/or caused by short-selling. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed a temporary ban on short sales against financial institutions in an effort to ease the pressure on their equity and debt. The SEC also came out and reaffirmed the illegality of naked short sales. Various other remedies have been proposed, including: having hedge funds register with the SEC and reveal their positions; easing of mark-to-market accounting rules, which have exerted extreme valuation pressure on banks' balance sheets; further regulation of the CDS market (presently, there are several exchanges proposed that would better organize this market and require participants to post margin); and other proposed rules and regulations that all aim at imposing additional regulatory oversight in these various markets, on the various underlying equity, debt and their derivatives, and on speculators and investors that participate in these markets/instruments.

Many recent articles have highlighted the problems short-selling has created in the financial markets: “Naked Short Sales Provoke Complaints but No Cases” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 19, 2009), “One Way to Stop Bear Raids” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 24, 2009), “Global Stock Cops Look to Rein In Shorts” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 24, 2009), “Short Selling—New Idiom: March Came in Like a Bear” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 25, 2009), “Exchanges Try to Limit Shorts Ban” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 25, 2009), “‘Naked’ Ban Is Extended By Japan” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 25, 2009), “Have We Seen the Last of the Bear Raids” (The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 26, 2009) “Wrangling Ahead on Short-Sale Plans” (The Wall Street Journal, Apr. 9, 2009), “'Empty Creditors' and the Crisis” (The Wall Street Journal, (Apr. 10, 2009) to name a few of the most recent. However, as all of the articles make clear, short-selling is a very hard process to manage and regulate, as many speculators, investors and, even hedgers, are not required to report various positions across all equity, debt and derivative instruments. The use of leverage by market participants further exacerbates the negative effects of short-selling.

As illustrated above, short-selling has become a huge problem in today's capital markets, as it can increase a company's or government's borrowing costs and can cause excessive dilution via new equity issuance. It also can increase volatility in a company's or government's securities, which can force longer-term security holders to sell their securities to avoid a loss. Every proposal to address the problems associated with short-selling, to date, has been regulatory in nature. What is needed is a market-based solution that allows security issuers to manage short-selling in their securities.

Also known in the prior art is the ability of market practitioners to unbundle various sets of rights associated with issued securities in order to derive added benefit from the individual rights associated with issued securities (equity and debt). As an example, a hedge fund may purchase a large block of stock in a company in order to exercise the voting rights associated with those shares for/against management's proposals and, at the same time, buy downside derivative protection in the form of equity put options (or other equity derivatives) on those shares to hedge against any downside move in the stock. This strategy has effectively allowed the hedge fund to gain control of a voting interest (voting rights) in the company without economic exposure should the stock it is holding move lower (in fact, the hedge fund can gain the voting interest (voting rights) and profit if the stock moves lower via this arrangement).

Similarly, an investor may hold an equity or debt security and pledge the income stream (right to dividend payments (equity) or right coupon payments (debt)) toward a charity, educational entity or trust. Effectively, the investor has unbundled an equity or debt right from the sets of rights that accompany issued equity and/or debt.

U.S. Publication No. 20050125323 to Warren, U.S. Publication No. 20020198833 to Wohlstadter, U.S. Publication No. 20050080705 to Chaganti, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,310,616 to Sugahara all disclose various methods for recognizing and trading various security rights of issued securities. However, each of these prior art references fail to address, either singularly or in combination with each other, the aforementioned problems associated with short-selling of a company's (equity and debt) or a government's (debt) securities, as each still allows a company's or government's issued securities to be shorted—a process over which, the company or government has no control. And, as demonstrated in the aforementioned hedge fund voting right example, it is possible for an investor/speculator to use and manipulate individual security rights to the detriment of the issuing company, government, or other entity.

In view of all of the aforementioned shortcomings, deficiencies and inefficiencies that exist in financial marketplaces, there is a great need in the art for improved systems and methods for solving the problem(s) associated with investors, speculators and/or hedgers putting unwarranted downward pressure on the prices of companies' and governments' equity and debt instruments through short sales and the use of derivative instruments, while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of the prior art apparatus and methodologies heretofore known.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

Accordingly, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide a method of, and system for, solving the inefficiencies of prior art security structuring and issuing/offering methods, while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of the prior art apparatus and methodologies.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and system which inherently recognize the separate, withholdable, and transferable rights associated with equity and debt instruments (collectively, securities instruments) issuance, thereby enabling the maximization of economic value that such property can support within the marketplace.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such a method and system, wherein the rights associated with issuing securities (equity, debt and hybrid securities) are automatically unbundled (i.e. individually separated) in such form that each individual right, or subsets of individual rights, can be withheld prior to issuance and then transferred independently of the other rights in an effort to optimize the utility and economic value to the security issuer.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such a method and system wherein the issuers of equity and/or debt securities are afforded the opportunity to freely withhold and transfer certain of the rights they possess as issuers of these securities in order to limit certain other activities they may deem detrimental to their interests as issuers of equity and/or debt securities.

Another object of the present invention is to provide issuers of equity and debt securities with the ability to prevent speculators and other non-investing entities from selling short an issuer's debt or equity securities by allowing the issuer of said securities to withhold the right to lend those securities (ER (κ, $) (equity), DR (η, $)) (debt), in order to prevent them from being lent to short-sellers to sell short.

Another object of the present invention is to provide issuers of equity and debt securities with the ability to prevent investors, speculators and others from using the issuer's equity or debt securities as collateral for borrowing, or other trading and investing activities, by allowing the issuer, owner and/or holder of said securities to withhold the right to post those securities as collateral (ER (ι, $) (equity), DR (ζ, $)) (debt) in order to prevent them from being used as collateral for borrowing, trading or investing.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such a method and system, wherein the sets of rights associated with equity securities {ER (α. . . λ, $)} and debt securities {DR (α. . . ι, $)} possessed by an issuer of equity and/or debt securities, are separate and divisible.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such a method and system, wherein the set of rights possessed by issuers of equity, debt and hybrid securities can be utilized in non-mutually exclusive manners.

Another object of the present invention is to allow security issuers to establish pricing for the withheld rights to lend their equity and/or debt securities in order to optimize income associated with leasing or selling the withheld rights to lend its securities, for the benefit of the issuing entity and, thus, its investors.

Another object of the present invention is to allow security issuers to determine how much, if any, of its withheld rights to lend (equity, debt and hybrid) in order to control short-selling of its securities and profit from any short-selling of its securities.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an Internet-based method and system, wherein all participating security issuers feed all security rights information (withheld rights, transferred rights, etc.) directly into a database maintained by the system, for the purpose of allowing the Internet-based system to catalogue and display certain securities rights information to issuers, owners and/or holders of equity, debt and hybrid securities.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such an Internet-based method and system, wherein a process is provided to allow the system to rank various equity, debt and hybrid securities for a system user's benefit via criteria that may differ vastly from that typically employed by a system user.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such an Internet-based method and system, whereby institutional users are provided with a manual and/or automatic means for accessing the universe of securities rights details (details on individual security's rights withholdings, transfers, etc.), thereby ensuring that they fulfill their fiduciary duty to their investors who seek the various qualities/securities rights in the securities they purchase, sell and hold.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such an Internet-based method and system, wherein financial institutions and any entity holding a fiduciary responsibility have the ability to fulfill their obligations to their investors by seeking the best rights terms, thereby reducing potential legal liability associated with the failure to fulfill attendant fiduciary responsibilities and obligations.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such an Internet-based method and system, wherein a system user would still be able to establish one or more important criteria regarding various securities rights and then allow the system to take over and make investment decisions based on the limited criteria provided by a system user.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an Internet-based method and system, wherein security issuers are able to exact higher remuneration from banks or financial institutions for security rights withheld prior to issuance, mainly the rights to lend the issuer's equity and debt securities.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an Internet-based method and system, wherein relational databases automatically receive pricing information from various security issuers for the issuers' equity and debt securities and display the information based on absolute rank and, separately, on the system user's and on the system's preferences.

Another object of the present invention is to provide such an Internet-based method and system, wherein government regulatory agencies can actively monitor all security right(s) withholdings, transfers, sales, leases, and other related transactions.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an Internet-based method and system for representing and accounting for the security rights held by security issuers, and the transfers of such rights among a network of financial institutions, provided by the Internet-based system and method of the present invention.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a transparent “netting” process through which financial institutions settle withheld/transferred security rights amongst themselves.

Another object of the present invention is to provide security issuers of securities already issued and outstanding, with the ability to convert those existing, issued securities into new securities withholding the right(s) to lend their equity and/or debt securities to preclude short-selling of securities already issued. This will allow security issuers to preclude behavior they deem detrimental to their own interests while, at the same time, providing additional security value and protection to their investors.

Another object of the present invention is to provide security issuers (companies, governments, and others) the ability to market various withheld and/or unbundled security (debt, equity and/or hybrid) rights (principally, the right(s) to lend equity and/or debt securities) in order to control and profit from the unlocked value of those rights. For example, a company could withhold the right to lend its shares to short-sellers to preclude short-selling, and the company could then lease that right to lend its securities to short-sellers at rates it deems advantageous to it and to its shareholders.

Another object of the present invention is to provide issuers with the ability to classify their various securities of all types with certain alphanumeric-coded designations to signify that certain securities cannot be lent, used as collateral, sold, or used in any other way that may contravene the issuer's original, included specifications upon issuance.

These and other objects of the present invention will become more apparent from the descriptions and drawings contained herein, and are, by no means, confined or limited by other improvements or advantages that may be realized.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to understand more fully the Objects of the Invention, the following Detailed Description of the Illustrative Embodiments should be read in conjunction with the appended figure drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation illustrating the flow of securities and money from the conventional securities underwriting process, wherein a company utilizes an investment bank or bank to underwrite and distribute equity, debt and hybrid securities to various investor groups, which pay the investment bank and/or bank (underwriter(s)) for the securities; the investment bank or bank then forwards the proceeds from the securities issuance to the company after subtracting the underwriting fees and, typically, the investment bank continues to make a market in said securities and offer brokerage services for the securities;

FIG. 2A is a schematic representation of the various rights traditionally possessed by owners and/or holders of equity securities;

FIG. 2B is a schematic representation of the various rights traditionally possessed by owners and/or holders of debt securities;

FIG. 3A sets forth a set of equations that formally recognize and describe a broad set of security rights (ER (α. . . λ, $)) possessed, and grantable, by an issuer of an equity security prior to issuance, which can be separated and structured into a package of security rights to be issued as an equity security to more perfectly suit an equity issuer's needs, and illustrating that, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, this set of individual rights is divisible and combinable, and each individual right is separately able to be withheld, prior to issuance, or transferred, in a non-mutually exclusive manner, so as to maximize the utility of equity securities to the equity security issuer in the global marketplace, in a manner akin to the bundle of rights possessed through ownership of land, including rights pertaining to minerals, timber, agriculture, surface usage, water usage, air usage, and riparian and development rights, to name the most common individual rights associated with owning and/or holding real property;

FIG. 3B sets forth a set of equations that formally recognize and describe a broad set of security rights (DR (α. . . ι, $)) possessed, and grantable, by an issuer of a debt security prior to issuance, which can be separated and packaged into a set of security rights to be issued as a debt security to more perfectly suit a debt issuer's needs, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, and illustrating that, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, this set of individual rights is divisible and combinable, and each individual right is separately able to be withheld, prior to issuance, or transferred, in a non-mutually exclusive manner, so as to maximize the utility of debt securities to the debt security issuer in the global marketplace, in a manner akin to the bundle of rights possesses through ownership of land, including rights pertaining to minerals, timber, agriculture, surface usage, water usage, air usage, and riparian and development rights, to name the most common individual rights associated with owning and/or holding real property;

FIG. 4 is a high-level systems block diagram representation of the Internet-based Security Issuer Rights Management (SIRM) network of the present invention, realized as a carrier-class, globally-extensive packet-switched financial information management and communications network, designed and implemented on a Java-based, object-oriented integrated development environment (IDE) such as, for example, WebObjects 5.2 IDE by Apple Computer Inc, Websphere IDE by IBM, or Weblogic IDE by BEA, or Microsoft® Visual Studio 2005.NET IDE;

FIG. 4A is a schematic representation of a first enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of the present invention;

FIG. 4B is a schematic representation of a second enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of the security rights withholding process of the SIRM network of the present invention carried out on the SIRM network shown in FIG. 4, wherein only the rights to lend equity and/or debt, withheld and retained by an issuer of security ownership interests (shares, preferred shares, warrants, units, bonds, bills, notes, and all other equity and debt interests), are withheld by the security issuer prior to issuance, while the remaining subset of security rights is issued to a purchaser through an initial public offering (IPO), debt offering, or subsequent security offering; by withholding the security right to lend from the offering, the security issuer has effectively precluded anyone holding those security interests from lending them to short-sellers for shorting purposes, thereby allowing both the issuer and purchasers to maximize the utility of the security offering in the global marketplace in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 6A is a schematic representation of the equity rights withholding process of the SIRM network of the present invention carried out on the SIRM network shown in FIG. 6A, wherein only the right to lend shares (ER (κ, $)), withheld and retained by an issuer of equity ownership interests (shares, preferred shares, warrants, units, and all other equity interests) is withheld by the equity issuer prior to issuance, while the remaining subset of equity rights (ER (α. . . λ))-(ER (κ, $))) is issued to a purchaser through an initial public offering (IPO) or subsequent security offering, thereby effectively precluding anyone holding those equity interests from lending them to short-sellers for short-selling purposes, and allowing both the issuer and equity security purchasers to maximize the utility of the equity offering in the global marketplace in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 6B is a schematic representation of the SIRMP of the present invention carried out on the SIRM network shown in FIG. 4, wherein its various components interact so as to enable a equity security issuer (equity issuer) to withhold, retain, and transfer the right to lend equity securities (ER (κ, $)), while retaining the right to withhold one or more equity rights associated with equity issuance, in order to help an equity security issuer to achieve its goals with respect to equity issuance, and with respect to its ability to control and profit from the retention, and transference of, the withheld equity right to lend;

FIG. 6C is a flow chart depicting the various steps carried out during the equity right(s) issuance withholding process of the present invention depicted in FIG. 6B illustrating the withholding and retention by an equity-issuing company, of the equity right to lend (ER (κ, A$));

FIG. 7A is a schematic representation of the debt rights withholding process of the present invention carried out on the SIRM network shown in FIG. 4, wherein only the right to lend debt (DR (η, $)), withheld and retained by an issuer of debt ownership interests (bonds, notes, commercial paper, and all other debt, instruments) is withheld by the debt issuer prior to issuance, while the remaining subset of debt rights DR (α. . . ι, $)-DR (η, $) is issued to a purchaser through a debt offering (corporate or government) or subsequent security offering, thereby allowing the security issuer to effectively preclude anyone holding those debt interests from lending them to short-sellers for short-selling purposes, and allowing both the issuer and purchasers to maximize the utility of the debt offering in the global marketplace in accordance with principles of the present invention;

FIG. 7B is a schematic representation of the debt-based SIRM of the present invention carried out on the network of FIG. 4, showing its various components interacting so as to enable a debt security issuer (debt issuer) to withhold, retain, and transfer the right to lend debt securities (DR (η, $)), while one or more debt rights associated with debt issuance can be withheld and retained by the debt security issuer, in order to help a debt security issuer to achieve its goals with respect to debt issuance, and with respect to its ability to control and profit from the retention and transference of the withheld debt right to lend;

FIG. 7C is a flow chart depicting the various steps of the withholding by a debt-issuing company of the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) carried out during the debt rights transfer process illustrated in FIG. 7B;

FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of a SIRM network of the present invention employing a Non-borrowable (non-shortable) Equity and/or Debt Security Exchange, and illustrating a process whereby equity and/or debt (and all hybrid) securities issued (or converted) by companies that have withheld the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) and/or the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) from their equity or debt securities (denoted by an “L” after the normal equity or debt symbol), making those securities non-borrowable and, thus, impossible to short-sell by speculators, hedgers and/or investors—the “L” after the normal equity or debt symbol signifies a “long-only” security, which also precludes naked short-selling, as the security's symbol designates it as a long-only security; the “Long-Only Security Exchange” functions just like a normal security exchange, where buyers, typically represented by brokerage firms, buy and sell equity and/or debt securities, and all required transactions are reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as to state security regulators;

FIG. 8A is a schematic representation of a first enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of FIG. 8;

FIG. 8B is a schematic representation of second enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of the present invention; FIG. 8C is a flow chart depicting the various steps carried out during the Non-borrowable (non-shortable) Equity and/or Debt Security Exchange and Network of the present invention, shown in FIG. 8;

FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of the SIRM network of FIG. 8, supporting the Security Conversion Process of the present invention which allows companies (equity, debt, and hybrid securities) and governments (debt and hybrid securities) to convert their outstanding, issued securities issues into “long-only” securities by way of separating and withholding the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) and/or the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)), wherein a participating company or government has one or more investment banks utilize the SIRMP system to restructure its outstanding equity, debt or other security issue(s) by withholding the right to lend that security (equity, debt or other), and then reissue the new security either back to the original owner/holder, back to the company or government, or to the public via the security markets, with the company or government retaining the withheld right to lend its equity and/or debt to preclude short-selling;

FIG. 9A is a schematic representation of a first enterprise-level Implementation of the SIRM network of FIG. 8;

FIG. 9B is a schematic representation of a second enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of FIG. 8;

FIG. 9C is a flow chart depicting the various steps carried out during the Security Conversion Process of the present invention carried out on the SIRM network of FIG. 9;

FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of the SIRM network of the present invention employing a Corporate/Government Controlled Rights Management Exchange according to the present invention, which allows corporations, governments and/or government agencies to control the selling short of their equity and/or debt securities by determining lease rates, time periods and the amount of total float available for leasing the withheld equity and/or debt right(s) to lend (ER (κ,), (DR (η, $)), needed by short-sellers to short the securities;

FIG. 10A is a schematic representation of a first enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of FIG. 9;

FIG. 10B is a schematic representation of a second enterprise-level implementation of the SIRM network of FIG. 9; and

FIG. 10C is a flow chart depicting the various steps carried out during the Corporate/Government Controlled Rights Management Exchange Process of the present invention supported on the SIRM network of FIG. 10.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

Referring to the figures in the accompanying Drawings, the illustrative best mode embodiments of the present invention will now be described in greater technical detail, wherein like parts are indicated by like reference numbers.

Overview of the Method of Security Issuer (Equity & Debt) Rights Withholding and Transfer According to the Principles of the Present Invention

Referring to FIG. 3A, there is presented an important set of equations that formally recognizes a broad set of security (equity) rights, possessed and grantable by an issuer of equity securities (ER (α. . . λ, $)), prior to a security's issuance. In accordance with the principle of the present invention, this set of security (equity) rights can be separated and structured into a package of security rights to be issued as an equity security to more perfectly suit an equity issuer's needs, thereby allowing certain right(s) to be effectively withheld prior to equity security structuring and issuance by an issuing company or other entity or, which, can be utilized to convert already issued equity securities into non-shortable equity securities in the global financial marketplace in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As will be described in greater detail hereinafter, the withholding of such security rights prior to issuance, or via the conversion process, is carried out using the Equity Issuer Rights Management Process (EIRMP) of the present invention, which recognizes and ensures that the above-identified set of individual equity rights is divisible and combinable prior to equity issuance, and that the individual right to lend equities (ER (κ, $)) is separately withholdable prior to security issuance, enabling a company or other entity to effectively preclude short-selling of its equity securities—a process companies have, heretofore, been unable to stop to their great detriment.

Referring to FIG. 3B, there is presented an important set of equations that formally recognizes a broad set of security (debt) rights (DR (α. . . ι, $)), possessed and grantable by an issuer, owner and/or holder of debt securities. This set of security (debt) rights can be separated and structured into a package of security rights to be issued as an equity security to more perfectly suit an equity issuer's needs, allowing certain right(s) to be effectively withheld prior to debt security structuring and issuance by an issuing company, government, government agency or other entity, or which can be utilized to convert already issued debt securities into unshortable debt securities in the global financial marketplace, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As will be described in greater detail hereinafter, the withholding of such security rights is carried out using the Debt Issuer Rights Management Process (DIRMP) of the present invention, which recognizes and ensures that the above-identified set of individual debt rights is divisible and combinable prior to debt issuance, and that the individual right to lend debt securities (DR (η, $)) is separately withholdable prior to debt issuance, enabling a company, government, government agency or other entity to effectively preclude short-selling of its debt securities.

Implementation of the Various Embodiments of the SIRMP Information Network of the Present Invention

As shown in FIGS. 4 through 7C, the SIRM network of the present invention 10 supports services necessary to carry out the SIRMP illustrated in FIG. 5, the EIRMP illustrated in FIGS. 6A, 6B and 6C and the DIRMP illustrated in FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C of the present invention. Preferably, the SIRM network 10 is designed and implemented as an industrial-strength carrier-class Internet-based financial information communications network of an object-oriented system engineering (OOSE) design, as taught in Applicant's copending U.S. application Ser. Nos. 11/328,433 and 11/651,413, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

As shown in FIG. 4, the SIRM network 10 comprises a diverse arrangement of computer systems (client and server machines) and networks interfaced with the infrastructure of the Internet, namely: computer systems (client and server machines) and networks supporting brokerage firms and investment banks 11; computer systems (client and server machines) and networks supporting regulatory agencies 14; computer systems (client and server machines) and networks supporting investment institutions and entities 13; computer systems (client and server machines) and networks supporting companies and governments 16; and the SIRMP Data Center 12 supporting Internet-based packet communications with the brokerage firms, investment banks, investment entities, and regulatory agencies on the SIRM network.

As will be described in greater detail hereinafter, the SIRMP Data Center 12 supports various information services between the various computer systems within the network, and among its various users. The SIRMP Data Center 12 will typically include arrays of relational database servers (RDBMS), application servers, and web and other communication servers, arranged in a three-tier structure, and secured by network firewalls, routers, switches and the like, well known in the art.

Each computer system and network within network groups 11, 13, 14 and 16, will typically include arrays of relational database servers (RDBMSs), application servers, and web and other communication servers, arranged in a three-tier structure and secured by network firewalls, routers, switches and the like, in addition to an arrangement of client machines supporting GUI interfaces, with which human users interface in a manner well known in the art.

In practice, the object-oriented SIRM network (system) will be developed using available object-oriented technology. Such object-oriented system development can involve any suitable Java-based, object-oriented integrated development environment (IDE) e.g. WebObjects 5.2 by Apple Computer Inc, Websphere IDE by IBM, or Weblogic IDE by BEA; or another object-oriented programming language such as C sharp, supported by the Microsoft® Visual Studio 2005. NET IDE.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show two alternative implementations of the enterprise-level SIRM network of the present invention 12 shown in FIG. 4 using the WebObjects® IDE and Java Application Server 21, 22, 29, 30. Although it is understood that other IDE's and server technology platforms can be used to implement and deploy server components of the SIRMP Data Center 12. In FIG. 4A, the SIRM network implementation involves using Web-based clients that can access services on the SIRM network using http, well known in the art. In FIG. 4B, the SIRM network implementation involves using clients programs running on the OS of the client machine, so that the user can access services on the SIRM network using TCP/IP or other communication protocols known in the art. In other embodiments of the SIRM network of the present invention, including those shown in FIGS. 4, 8, 9 and 10, combinations of these two approaches can be used in combination, in a manner known in the enterprise level object-oriented system engineering (OOSE) art.

In FIG. 8, another embodiment of the SIRM network of the present invention is shown, which is similar to the network in FIG. 4, except that the SIRM network embodiment shown in FIG. 8 further includes a Long-Only Security Exchange 77, which supports the non-borrowable (non-shortable) equity and/or debt security exchange process illustrated in the process flow chart of FIG. 8C. The Long-Only Security Exchange 77 can be realized using the same OOSE technology used to implement the SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4.

In FIG. 9, another embodiment of the SIRM network of the present invention is shown, which is similar to the network in FIG. 4, except that it supports the SIRMP Security Conversion Process of the present invention, illustrated in the block of FIG. 16, and the process flow chart of FIG. 9C.

In FIG. 10, yet another embodiment of the SIRM network of the present invention is shown, which is similar to the network in FIG. 4, except that the SIRM network embodiment shown in FIG. 9 further supports the Corporate/Government Controlled Rights Management Exchange Process illustrated in FIG. 10C.

It is appropriate at this juncture to provide a brief overview of the Internet-Based SIRM network present invention.

Brief Overview Of The Internet-Based SIRM Network Of The Present Invention

The Internet-based SIRM network of the present invention operates in a financial marketplace, and comprises an information network infrastructure operably connected to the infrastructure of the Internet, as shown in FIG. 4. The SIRM network includes one or more equity-issuing companies and/or one or more debt-issuing companies, and a network level financial accounting system_that is supported by the web, application and RDBMS servers in the Data Center 12, and various component servers distributed throughout the SIRM network of the present invention, over participating companies, governments, government agencies, financial institutions, and investors. The network level financial accounting system_is a component of the object-oriented software-based system that is supported by the web, application and RDBMS servers configured according to a multi-tier network architecture, residing in the Data Center 12, and various component servers distributed over the network of participating companies, governments, government agencies, financial institutions, and investors.

The network-level financial accounting system (i) recognizes and accounts for a set of equity rights possessed prior to equity issuance by an issuer of equity securities and (ii) ensures that said set of equity rights is unbundled, separated into a plurality of individual equity rights (ER (α. . . λ, $)), including the equity right to lend (κ, $), and recombined into new, issueable securities that exclude the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $).

The network-level financial accounting system also (i) recognizes and accounts for a set of debt rights possessed by an issuer, owner and/or holder of debt securities and (ii) ensures that said set of debt rights is unbundled, separated into a plurality of individual debt rights (DR (α. . . ι, $)), including the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)), and recombined into new, issueable securities that exclude the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)).

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the issuer (company or other entity) of an equity security (i) withholds from, and prior to, an equity security structuring/offering, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the security and, thus, preclude short sales of the security or, (ii) restructures an existing, outstanding equity security to exclude from, and retain, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the equity security and, thus, preclude short sales of the security.

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the issuer (company or government) of a debt security (i) withholds from, and prior to, a debt security structuring/offering, the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the debt security and, thus preclude short sales of the security or, (ii) restructures an existing, outstanding debt security to exclude from, and retain, the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the debt security and, thus, preclude short sales of the debt security.

When a transfer of the individual right(s) to lend equity and/or debt occurs, the Internet-based SIRM system/network automatically accounts for the location of that/those rights and collects and remits proper payment in exchange for those rights.

Security Issuer Rights Management Process (SIRMP) of the Present Invention

As shown in FIG. 5, the Security Issuer Rights Management Process (SIRMP) of the present invention represents a significant improvement over the conventional security Issuance (Prior Art) as illustrated in FIG. 1. In FIG. 5, the SIRMP is shown with a security issuer 34 withholding, prior to structuring and issuance, the right to lend 36 its security in order to allow a security issuer 34 to prevent that security at issuance (or thereafter), from being lent to speculators and investors for the purpose of borrowing that security to short-sell it into the market; at the same time, all of the other security rights 37 within the bundle possessed prior to issuance by the issuer 34 are issued to purchaser 35 of the security for full use by an owner or holder to maximize the utility of the security held in the global financial marketplace, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

By withholding the right to lend the security prior to security structuring and issuance, the security-issuing entity has effectively precluded a short-sale of the security, as it cannot be sourced and borrowed by a speculator or investor for the purpose of selling it short. Also, by withholding the right to lend 36 a security prior to structuring and issuance, the security issuer 34 has also effectively precluded naked short-selling (an illegal but common practice) of the security because all market participants, brokers and dealers will be aware that the security cannot be lent to be shorted. The security issuer 34 has effectively prevented short-selling of this security making it safer for long-term investors to purchase and hold, because only those actually holding the security will be able to sell it to other interested buyers, and because the security will not be available for those looking to sell it short as a hedge against derivative instruments bought/sold on the underlying security. If it is impossible to hedge derivative instruments by shorting a security, there will be less speculative selling pressure on the security, which will allow it greater flexibility (and less dilution) in raising capital via future equity and/or debt issuance.

The practice of short-selling is often defended with the argument that it adds liquidity to the market. To combat the potential issue of reduced liquidity, the security issuer 34 could simply increase the amount of initial securities issued and lower the price to raise a similar amount of money. The increased number of securities will help provide additional liquidity.

Equity Issuer Rights Management Process (EIRMP) of the Present Invention

As shown in FIG. 6A, the E represents a significant improvement over the conventional security issuance (Prior Art) as illustrated in FIG. 1. In this figure, the EIRMP is shown with an equity issuer 40 withholding the individual right to lend an equity security (ER (κ, $)) 42 possessed by an equity issuer 40 prior to an equity issue's structuring and issuance, in order to allow an equity security issuer 40 to prevent that security, at issuance (or thereafter), from being lent to speculators and investors for the purpose of borrowing that security to short-sell it into the market, while all of the other equity rights within the bundle possessed by the issuer prior to structuring and issuance (ER (α. . . λ, $))-(ER (κ, $)) 43 are structured and issued to purchasers 41 of the equity security for full use by an owner or holder to maximize the utility of the equity security held in the global financial marketplace, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

By withholding the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) 42 prior to security structuring and issuance, the equity-issuing company or entity 40 has effectively precluded a short-sale of the equity security, either by the initial purchaser 41 or, by subsequent purchasers 41; it cannot be sourced and borrowed by a speculator or investor for the purpose of selling it short. Also, by withholding the equity right to lend (κ, $)) 42 prior to structuring and issuance, the equity security issuer 40 has also effectively precluded naked short-selling (an illegal but common practice) of the security because all market participants, brokers and dealers will be aware that the security cannot be lent to be shorted. The equity security issuer 40 has effectively prevented short-selling of this security, making it safer for long-term investors to purchase and hold, because only those actually holding the security will be able to sell it to other interested buyers, and because the security will not be available for those looking to sell it short as a hedge against derivative instruments bought/sold on the underlying security. Furthermore, by precluding speculators and investors from selling short the equity security 43, speculators and investors cannot pressure a company's or entity's equity in order to make it more expensive/more dilutive for a company or entity to raise new capital via equity security issuance.

As illustrated in FIG. 6B, the implementation of the Security Issuer Rights Management Process (SIRMP) (Equity) of FIG. 5 is shown incorporating the SIRMP Data Center 12, an equity security-issuing company 16, a brokerage/equity underwriting firm (investment bank, merchant bank, bank or other financial institution) 11, various equity-purchasing entities (individuals, hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, insurers, endowments, municipalities, governments, sovereign wealth funds and exchange-traded funds) 13, various regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and state security regulators, and, finally, the various securities exchanges 14. Each of the aforementioned participants is linked to the others via various communications networks and via the Internet 15.

As shown in FIG. 6B, an equity security-issuing company (Company A) 16 hires an equity security brokerage/underwriting firm (investment bank, etc.) 11, utilizing the SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4, to help structure and issue equity securities in order to raise capital to fund the firm's operations. The equity security underwriter 11 structures Company A's 16 new equity security issue 43 and, at the instruction of Company A 16, incorporates the system and method of the present invention, whereby the equity underwriter 11 recognizes that an equity security consists of a bundle of rights (ER (α. . . λ, A$)) 42, 43, which can be unbundled, separated, and recombined into an individual, issueable security. From this bundle of rights, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, A$)) 42 is withheld prior to structuring and issuance in order to allow an equity issuer to either preclude or control short-selling of its equity security issue in the global financial marketplace.

The equity security underwriter 11 structures Company A's 16 equity security issue (in this example) so that Company A withholds the right to lend its equity securities (ER (κ, A$)) 42 prior to issuance of the new Company A equity security, which now is represented by the equation (ER (α. . . λ, A$))-(ER (κ, A$)) 43. The equity underwriter 11 then offers for purchase Company A's new security 43 to a broad array of investors including: individuals, hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, insurers, endowments, municipalities, governments, sovereign wealth funds and exchange-traded funds 13. These investors pay the equity underwriter 11 for their Company A equity security 43 purchases, and the equity underwriter 11 forwards the proceeds of the offering to Company A 16 less any previously agreed commission for the underwriter's services. Company A 16, the equity security underwriter 11 and, in some cases, various of the equity purchasing entities 13, report all facets of the security's structure, offering terms, sale and purchases to the various regulatory agencies 14 as represented in FIG. 6B.

Company A 16 has now issued a new equity security 43 and raised new capital but has withheld from the purchasers 13 the equity right to lend (ER (κ, A$)) 42 this security for the purposes of short-selling this security issue, as speculators and investors cannot borrow this security issue from the purchasers for the purpose of selling them short. Furthermore, it will be much harder for speculators and investors to purchase bearish derivative instruments on Company A's new shares 43, as the potential sellers of those bearish derivative instruments will be unable to borrow Company A's 16 new equity security 43 to sell short in an effort to hedge their sale of the bearish derivative instruments. Company A 16 has also effectively precluded leveraged, bearish exchange-traded funds (ETF's) from including Company A's new equity security 43 in their funds, as the ETF's are also precluded from borrowing the shares to sell short. Holders of Company A's new equity security 43 enjoy all of the benefits (issued equity rights) of normal equity ownership, except that they cannot lend the new security 43 to investors and speculators for the purpose of short-selling it.

As indicated at Block A in FIG. 6C, Company A hires an investment bank/equity underwriting firm, utilizing the SIRMP of FIG. 5, for the purpose of structuring and issuing a new equity security to withhold the equity right to lend that security (ER (κ, A$)). At Block B, the investment bank/equity underwriting firm structures Company A's equity security by withholding/excluding from the new equity issue the equity right to lend the new Company A equity securities (ER (κ, A$)), which is retained by Company A. At Block C, the investment bank/equity underwriting firm then issues the new Company A equity security ((ER (α. . . λ, A$)-(ER (κ, A$)) to its network of investors and speculators. At Block D, the investors and speculators pay for the new Company A equity security, and the investment bank/equity underwriting firm delivers the proceeds from the new equity offering to Company A, less any fees/commissions; the equity right to lend the new Company A equity security (ER (κ, A$)) has been retained by Company A. At Block E, all parties report required transactions to the various security regulators and security exchange(s).

Debt Issuer Rights Management Process (DIRMP) of the Present Invention

As shown in FIG. 7A, the Debt Issuer Rights Management Process (DIRMP) of the present invention represents a significant improvement on the conventional security issuance (Prior Art) as illustrated in FIG. 1. In FIG. 7A, the DIRMP is shown with a debt issuer 57 withholding the individual right to lend debt securities (DR (η, $)) 59 possessed by a debt issuer 57 prior to a debt issue's structuring and issuance, in order to allow a debt security issuer 57 to prevent that security, at issuance (or thereafter), from being lent to speculators and investors for the purpose of borrowing that security to short-sell it into the market, while all of the other debt rights within the bundle possessed by the issuer prior to structuring and issuance (DR (α. . . ι, $))-(DR (η, $)) 60 are structured and issued to purchasers 58 of the debt security for full use by an owner or holder to maximize the utility of the debt security held in the global financial marketplace, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

By withholding the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) 59 prior to security structuring and issuance, the debt-issuing company or government 57 has effectively precluded a short-sale of the debt security 60, as it cannot be sourced and borrowed by a speculator or investor for the purpose of selling it short. Also, by withholding the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) 59 prior to structuring and issuance, the debt security issuer 57 has also effectively precluded naked short-selling (an illegal but common practice) of the security because all market participants, brokers and dealers will be aware that the security cannot be lent to be shorted. The debt security issuer 57 has effectively prevented short-selling of this security 60 making it safer for long-term investors to purchase and hold, because only those actually holding the security will be able to sell it to other interested buyers, and because the security will not be available for those looking to sell it short as a hedge against derivative instruments bought/sold on the underlying security. Furthermore, by precluding speculators and investors from selling short the debt security 60, speculators and investors cannot pressure a company's or government's debt in order to force ratings agencies to lower their ratings on the security, which drives up a company's or government's future borrowing costs.

As shown in FIG. 7B, a debt security-issuing company (Company A) 16 hires a debt security brokerage/underwriting firm (investment bank, etc.) 11, utilizing the SIRMP 12 of FIG. 4, to help structure and issue a debt security in order to raise capital to fund the firm's operations. The debt security underwriter 11 structures Company A's new debt security issue 60 and, at the instruction of Company A 16, incorporates the system and method of the present invention, whereby the debt underwriter 11 recognizes that a debt security consists of a bundle of rights (DR (α. . . ι, $)) 59, 60, which can be unbundled, separated, and recombined into an individual, issueable security. From this bundle of rights, the debt right to lend (DR (η, A$)) 59 is withheld prior to structuring and issuance in order to allow a debt issuer to either preclude or control short-selling of its debt security in the global financial marketplace.

The debt security underwriter 11 structures Company A's debt security 60 so that Company A 16 withholds the debt right to lend (DR (η, A$)) 59 prior to issuance of the new Company A debt security, which now is represented by the equation (DR (α. . . ι, A$))-(DR (η, A$)) 60. The debt security underwriter 11 then offers for purchase Company A's new debt security issue 60 to a broad array of investors including: individuals, hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, insurers, endowments, municipalities, governments, sovereign wealth funds and exchange-traded funds 13. These investors pay the debt underwriter 11 for their Company A debt security 60 purchases, and the debt underwriter 11 forwards the proceeds of the offering to Company A 16 less any previously agreed commission for the underwriter's services. Company A 16, the debt security underwriter 11 and, in some cases, various of the debt purchasing entities 13, report all facets of the security's structure, offering terms, sale and purchases to the various regulatory agencies 14 as represented in FIG. 7B.

Company A 16 has now issued a new debt security 60 and raised new capital but has withheld from the purchasers the debt right to lend (DR (η, A$)) 59 the debt security for the purpose of short-selling that security, as speculators and investors cannot borrow this security from the purchasers for the purpose of short-selling them. Furthermore, it will be much harder for speculators and investors to purchase bearish derivative instruments on Company A's debt security issue 60, as the potential sellers of those bearish derivative instruments will be unable to borrow Company A's new debt security 60 to sell short in an effort to hedge their sale of the bearish derivative instruments. Company A 16 has also effectively precluded leveraged, bearish exchange-traded funds (ETF's) from including Company A's new debt security 60 in their funds, as the ETF's are also precluded from borrowing the debt security 60 to sell it short. Purchasers 13 of Company A's new debt security 60 enjoy all of the benefits (remaining debt rights) of normal debt ownership except they cannot lend the new security to investors and speculators for the purpose of short-selling it.

As indicated at Block A in FIG. 7C, Company A hires an investment bank/debt underwriting firm, utilizing the SIRMP 12 of FIG. 4, for the purpose of issuing a new debt security but withholding the debt right to lend that debt security (DR (η, A$)). At Block B, the investment bank/debt underwriting firm structures Company A's debt security by separating the attendant debt security rights and withholding the debt right to lend the new Company A debt security (DR (η, A$)), which is retained by Company A. At Block C, the investment bank/debt underwriting firm then issues the new Company A debt security (DR (α. . . ι, A$))-(DR (η, A$)) to its network of investors and speculators. At Block D, the investors and speculators pay for the new Company A debt security, and the investment bank/debt underwriting firm delivers the proceeds from the new debt offering to Company A, less any fees/commissions. At Block E, all parties report required transactions to the various security regulators and security exchange(s).

SIRM Network of the Present Invention Supporting A Non-Borrowable (Non-Shortable) Equity and/or Debt Security Exchange

As illustrated in FIG. 8, the non-borrowable (non-shortable) equity and/or debt security exchange is shown, wherein companies and/or governments 16 that have issued equity and/or debt securities (common stock, preferred stock, warrants and other equity securities, bonds, notes, or other debt securities, and all hybrids) and withheld the equity/debt right to lend those securities (ER (κ, $))/(DR (η$)) 42, 59, via the SIRMP 12, have listed their equity and/or debt securities (“JPM/L” is an example of these “long-only” securities). As these equity and/or debt securities, designated by the “L” after their normal equity/debt symbol for “long-only”, cannot be lent by the owner/holder of these equity and/or debt securities to other investors, hedgers and/or speculators 13 for the purpose of selling the securities short, these companies' or governments' 16 listed equity and/or debt securities cannot be sold short.

Similarly, these equity and/or debt securities are not subject to naked-shorting, as they trade on a “Long-Only Security Exchange” 77, and the “L” in each security's equity/debt symbol designates it as a “long-only” equity or debt security, as the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) 42 or the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) 59 has been withheld from the security prior to issuance leaving the subset of equity rights (ER (α. . . λ, $))-(ER (κ, $)) 42, 43 or the subset of debt rights (DR (α. . . ι, $))-(DR (η, $)) 59, 60 with the issued equity or debt security.

Most importantly, as shown in FIG. 8, all trades by market participants (individuals, hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, insurers, endowments, municipalities, governments, sovereign wealth funds, exchange-traded funds and others) 13 are conducted via various equity security accounts held at the market participants' brokerage firms 11 (Long-Only Security Exchange 77 Members). As such, the brokerage firms 11 have access to the market participants' positions and, can assure that only equity and/or debt securities already held by a market participant can be sold into the market, further precluding short sales of any type. In the event that market participants 13 (hedge funds and other speculators and investors) are concerned about secrecy of their trading, they can sell the “long-only” equity and/or debt securities with a brokerage firm other than that where they hold their “long-only” equity and debt securities, as long as proper netting agreements are in place—these will also serve to assure that only equity and/or debt securities already owned/held can be sold.

As with other security exchanges, all relevant transactions are reported to the various regulatory agencies 14 and monitored by the same.

FIGS. 8A and 8B show two alternative implementations of the enterprise-level SIRMP Data Center 12 using the WebObjects® IDE and Java Application Server 21, 22, 29, 30, although it is understood that IDE's and server technology platforms can be used to implement and deploy server components of the SIRMP Data Center 12.

FIG. 8C is a flow chart depicting the non-borrowable (non-shortable) equity and/or debt security exchange and network of FIG. 8. As indicated at Block A, companies that have issued, or converted, their existing securities into non-shortable/non-borrowable equity or debt securities via the SIRMP, list their securities on the Long-Only Security Exchange. At Block B, investment institutions and entities then purchase the non-shortable/non-borrowable listed equity and/or debt securities via a brokerage firm that holds member status on the Long-Only Security Exchange. Finally, at Block C, the investment institutions and entities, along with the brokerage firm(s), report all pertinent transactions on the Long-Only Security Exchange to the proper Regulatory Agencies.

SIRM Network of the Present Invention Supporting Security Conversion Process

As is illustrated in FIG. 9, the SIRMP security conversion process of the present invention allows participating companies and governments 16 to convert already issued, outstanding equity, debt and other securities, which can be borrowed and sold short, into “long-only”securities, which cannot be borrowed/sold-short, by employing the SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4.

A company, government, or other entity 16 with outstanding security issues sends notice to the owners and holders of one or more of its security issues, announcing a proxy vote on converting its outstanding security or securities into a “long-only” security or securities. Through the conversion process, the security issuer 16 normally hires an investment bank(s) 11 utilizing the SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4, to withhold and retain the equity and/or debt right to lend ((ER (κ, $)), (DR (η, $))) 42, 59 that/those security/securities, precluding it/them from being lent to speculators, investors and/or hedgers for the purpose of selling them short and betting against the fortunes of the companies or government.

Once the notice of conversion has been sent (and approval received, if needed), the company or government 16 enlists the services of one or more investment banks 11 to complete the conversion process. The investment bank(s) 11 utilize(s) the system and methods of the SIRMP 12 of the present invention to restructure and reissue new securities, (ER (α. . . λ, $))-(ER (κ, $)) 43 for equity securities, and (DR (α. . . ι, $))-(DR (η, $)) 60 for debt securities, pursuant to the security issuer's 16 desires which, in the example shown in FIG. 9, involve the issuer 16 withholding either the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) 42 or the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) 59.

Once restructured and reissued by the investment bank(s) 11, the company, government, or other entity 16 using the system and methods of the SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4, has effectively precluded from short-selling the now “long-only” securities, which, in this example, are designated by an “L” following the security's standard symbol, by speculators, investors and/or hedgers.

All parties report required transactions and information to the relevant regulatory agencies and to the proper security exchange(s) 14.

FIGS. 9A and 9B show two alternative implementations of the enterprise-level SIRMP Data Center 12 of FIG. 4 using the WebObjects® IDE and Java Application Server 21, 22, 29, 30, although it is understood that IDE's and server technology platforms can be used to implement and deploy server components of the SIRMP Data Center 12.

FIG. 9C is a flow chart depicting the SIRMP Security Conversion Process of FIG. 9. As indicated in Block A of FIG. 9C, a company (JPM in this example) hires an investment bank/underwriting firm to restructure its existing, outstanding equity and/or debt securities (can be one or more of its security issues). At Block B, the investment bank/underwriting firm restructures JPM's existing, outstanding equity and/or debt securities using the system and methods of the present invention (SIRMP) and separates, and withholds, from the set of equity rights of the restructured equity security, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, JPM$)) and/or separates, and withholds, from the set of debt rights of the restructured debt security, the debt right to lend (DR (η, JPM$))—JPM now retains the equity and/or debt right to lend its security/securities. At Block C, the investment bank/underwriting firm either returns the new equity/debt securities, less the equity and debt rights to lend ((ER (κ, JPM$)), (DR (η, JPM$)), to the original owners/holders or, to the company in the case of treasury stock/debt, etc. The owners/holders receive JPM stock/debt with the following equity/debt rights: (ER (α. . . λ, JPM$))-(ER (κ, JPM$)) for equity securities and, (DR (α. . . ι, JPM$))-(DR (η, JPM$)) for debt securities. At Block D, all parties report required transactions to the various security regulators and security exchange(s).

SIRM Network of the Present Invention Supporting A Corporate/Government Controlled Rights Management Exchange

As shown in FIG. 10, the SIRMP corporate/government controlled rights management exchange of the present invention allows corporations, governments, government agencies, and other entities 16 to control the process through which their securities can be sold short, taking control of the short-selling process out of the hands of investors, speculators, hedgers, brokerage firms and others 13, and allowing companies, governments, or others, to assert their ability to control, manage, and profit from, the short-selling process of their own securities; the SIRMP Data Center 12 allows security issuers 16 to turn the shorting process on its head by controlling and charging for the ability to short their shares and/or debt securities. This exchange differs from that shown in FIG. 8 77, as it allows companies and governments 16 that have withheld the right(s) to lend their securities to profit by leasing those rights to potential short-sellers 13.

In the example shown in FIG. 10C, JPM (issuing company 16) has withheld prior to issuance, or repossessed via conversion, the right(s) to lend its equity securities ER (κ, JPM$)) 42 and/or its debt securities (DR (η, JPM$)) 59. This allows JPM to control completely the process required to short its equity and/or debt securities, as now any party interested in selling short JPM securities must agree to terms set by JPM.

Through the SIRMP Data Center 12, JPM sets the various criteria for shorting its securities. JPM sets the lease rates (can vary by type of entity), lease periods, determines the amount of total security float to offer for short-selling, and sets any other parameters deemed important for leasing the right(s) to lend its equity and/or debt securities.

Investors, speculators, hedgers, brokerage firms and others 13 then approach the SIRMP Data Center 12 of the present invention, via the Internet 15 or other methods of communication, to ascertain the various terms on which they can short JPM securities. If one of the aforementioned parties agrees to the terms set by JPM for shorting its equity and/or debt securities, that party then remits the required money to lease the equity 42 and/or debt right(s) to lend 59 to the SIRMP Data Center 12, which distributes the money directly to JPM. This is an important process, as it allows a short-seller to maintain complete anonymity, which is something short-sellers complain about when regulations are proposed to make their processes more transparent; they argue that if a company or government knows that they have shorted, or are interested in shorting, that company's/government's securities, that company/government will not be forthcoming with information, etc. The SIRMP Data Center 12 allows short-sellers to lease the right to lend a company's/government's securities 42, 59, directly, via the SIRMP Data Center 12, from the company/government, on the company's or government's terms, but with total anonymity. More importantly, the SIRMP Data Center 12 allows JPM to manage the entire short-selling process and profit from it directly.

Because all of the short-selling transactions for JPM equity and/or debt go through the SIRMP Data Center 12, it completely precludes naked short-selling, as the SIRMP Data Center 12 is able to allocate the equity and/or debt rights to lend 42 and/or 59 JPM's securities based on JPM's criteria.

All transactions are reported, as required to the various regulatory agencies 14.

FIGS. 10A and 10B show two alternative implementations of the enterprise-level SIRMP Data Center 13 of FIG. 10 using the WebObjects® IDE and Java Application Server 21, 22, 29, 30, although it is understood that IDE's and server technology platforms can be used to implement and deploy server components of the SIRMP Data Center 12.

FIG. 10C is a flow chart depicting the various steps of the SIRMP Corporate/Government Controlled Rights Management Exchange depicted in FIG. 10. As indicated at Block A of FIG. 10C, a company (JPM in this example) has either withheld the right(s) to lend its equity (ER (κJPM$)) or debt (DR (η, JPM$)) prior to issuance, or has converted its securities to withhold those rights, so that it holds the equity and/or the debt rights to lend its securities.

At Block B, via the SIRMP, JPM sets rates for investors, speculators, hedgers, brokerage firms, and others to lease the withheld/retained right(s) to lend its equity and/or debt securities at rates that seek to optimize profit for JPM. The rate schedule may be set to escalate with increasing interest to short its equity or debt. JPM also can set limits on the amount of rights it offers to shorts and, for the time that shorts may hold these rights, by requiring the shorts to release the right(s) to lend on a periodic basis. JPM controls the entire shorting process by setting the rates, amounts (by entity type, total float, other), and time periods that shorts may short its equity and debt securities. JPM can also specify different lease rates, amounts and periods based on the type of short-seller.

At Block C, the various investors, speculators, hedgers, brokerage firms, and others express their interest to short JPM's securities (equity or debt) via the SIRMP, thus assuring that the short-sellers remain anonymous to JPM. The short-seller(s) then remit(s) payment for leasing the right(s) to lend the JPM equity or debt securities to the SIRMP based on the aforementioned fee schedule determined by JPM.

At Block D, the SIRMP remits payment for the equity and debt right(s) back to JPM and reports, as required, all transactions to the proper regulatory authorities.

Also, it is understood that the illustrative embodiments may be modified in a variety of ways which will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art of having the benefit of the novel teachings disclosed herein. All such modifications and variations of the illustrative embodiments thereof shall be deemed to be within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the Claims to Invention appended hereto. 

1. An Internet-based security issuer rights management process (SIRMP) and operating in a financial marketplace, comprising: an information network infrastructure operably connected to the infrastructure of the Internet; one or more equity-issuing companies and/or one or more debt-issuing companies; a network level financial accounting system supported by network information infrastructure and extending over participating companies, governments, government agencies, financial institutions, and investors; wherein said network-level financial accounting system (i) recognizes and accounts for a set of equity rights possessed prior to equity issuance by an issuer of equity securities and (ii) ensures that said set of equity rights is unbundled, separated into a plurality of individual equity rights (ER (α. . . λ, $)), including the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $), and recombined into new, issueable securities that exclude the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $); wherein said network-level financial accounting system (i) recognizes and accounts for a set of debt rights possessed by an issuer, owner and/or holder of debt securities and (ii) ensures that said set of debt rights is unbundled, separated into a plurality of individual debt rights (DR (α. . . ι, $)), including the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)), and recombined into new, issueable securities that exclude the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)); wherein said issuer (company or other entity) of an equity security (i) withholds from, and prior to, an equity security structuring/offering, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the security and, thus, preclude short sales of the security or, (ii) restructures an existing, outstanding equity security to exclude from, and retain, the equity right to lend (ER (κ, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the equity security and, thus, preclude short sales of the security; wherein said issuer (company or government) of a debt security (i) withholds from, and prior to, a debt security structuring/offering, the debt right to lend (DR (η, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the debt security and, thus preclude short sales of the security or, (ii) restructures an existing, outstanding debt security to exclude from, and retain, the debt right to lend (DR η, $)) the security in order to preclude lending/borrowing of the debt security and, thus, preclude short sales of the debt security; wherein when a transfer of the individual right(s) to lend equity and/or debt occurs, said Internet-based system automatically accounts for the location of that/those rights and collects and remits proper payment in exchange for those rights.
 2. The Internet-based SIRMP of claim 1, wherein said information network infrastructure comprises web, application and database servers configured according to a multi-tier network architecture.
 3. The Internet-based SIRMP of claim 1, wherein said financial products include: all equity securities, all debt securities, and all hybrid equity and/or debt securities.
 4. The Internet-based SIRMP of claim 1, wherein issuers of equity and/or debt securities are afforded the opportunity to withhold and/or transfer the equity and/or debt right(s) to lend, which they possess prior to security structuring and issuance or, after security restructuring/conversion, so as to optimize profit from, and control, the short-selling of its equity and/or debt securities.
 5. A method and system, wherein equity and debt security issuers are able to withhold, prior to structuring and issuance, or after structuring and issuance via restructuring/conversion, the individual rights to lend equity and/or debt securities ((ER (κ, $), (DR (η, $)), so as to preclude short-sales of equity and debt securities.
 6. The method and system of claim 5, wherein issuers of equity and debt securities are able to restructure existing, outstanding equity and debt securities and withhold the individual rights to lend equity and debt securities ((κ, $), (DR (η, $)), so as to preclude short-sales of equity and debt securities.
 7. An Internet-based method and system, wherein security issuers can manage and control the processes and participants involved in short-selling their securities. 